<meta name='google-adsense-platform-account' content='ca-host-pub-1556223355139109'/> <meta name='google-adsense-platform-domain' content='blogspot.com'/> <!-- --><style type="text/css">@import url(https://www.blogger.com/static/v1/v-css/navbar/3334278262-classic.css); div.b-mobile {display:none;} </style> </head> <body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/25220065?origin\x3dhttp://kahneenah.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

Wednesday, August 08, 2007

WAH LAN.



Are JC and secondary school students not getting proper guidance on the Project Work or what???? Today some jc kids emailed the ENTIRE freakin sociology department their interview questions. How fucking indescriminate is that???? To make things worse, the so-called interview questions were practically their research questions, not even proper interview questions. In other words, if any one of us answered the questions (and they asked us to do so with "sufficient elaboration"), we would have actually done the entire project for them. What do we get in return? They would be "immensely grateful". How sweet.

Another group from our -ahem- "ivy league" boys' schools came to conduct a face-to-face interview with my colleague. Didn't even introduce themselves nor their research project, just that it's "...something about class and stratification", and promptly conducted the interview with a video camera. When asked why they needed the v-cam, they said: "for recording purposes". Like helloooo... that's like "why do you want to buy a drink from the shop?" Ans: "Because I want to drink." KNN! In the end, they admitted that it was actually for a documentary, NOT for mere "recording purposes". Didn't even bother asking for permission. In the end my colleague demanded they erase the recording and not use his interview in their research.

Where's the fucking research ethics? My God! What the heck are the schools teaching???? the syllabus is disturbingly inadequate and slipshod. They're going out there to do project work but without any fucking clue what they're doing! I sincerely hope that these are just isolated cases. But judging from the numerous emails we've been receiving in the past few months, i seriously don't it.


posted @5:11 PM
|

Profile

The Shane ManĀ® - Leader of the Largest Nation in the World.
Photobucket
PROCRASTINATION

links

SASA!; Darren!; Sahoo!; Stephie!; ryanC!; KesterPoooon!; Pinky Karen!; Mrs Auyong!; Andy!; Gen!; Yan'an!; Lilian!; Shareen Purplegirl; Justin?; Brenda!; ANN-NETTE!; Ferdi boy!; dumbspeak?; Grace Gan!

tagboard

credits

designer ; dafont
Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

archives

  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • March 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • Shane Pereira's Facebook Profile