<meta name='google-adsense-platform-account' content='ca-host-pub-1556223355139109'/> <meta name='google-adsense-platform-domain' content='blogspot.com'/> <!-- --><style type="text/css">@import url(https://www.blogger.com/static/v1/v-css/navbar/3334278262-classic.css); div.b-mobile {display:none;} </style> </head> <body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/25220065?origin\x3dhttp://kahneenah.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

Does anyone else think Alex Tan Tuan Loy deserves a finger up his arse?

I don't know why I read the forum anymore. It just reminds me how tooopid some people are. And it is just so unbearable. So, so unbearable. His letter was in response to Janadas Devans' article on "Can mum, mum and kids make a family" - ST, July 7. The article basically brings up the "myth" of the "good" traditional family, gives examples of how so-called deviant families can be as "good" for family life, or in fact be better than traditional family forms. He uses statistics to show abuse rates, break up of traditional family forms, etc.

And Mr Alex TTL just didn't get it. Granted, he brings up some reasonable "logical extreme" arguments, but for fucks' sake, don't you know that many good arguments are much more subtle and sophisticated than that?? (no of course not, why am I even asking you such a difficult question). Taking things "to a logical extreme" without proper thought of the content and aim of the piece is an act of absolute moronism. After ranting and raving through Devan's poor logical extremes, he gives absolutely NO reason why we should favour a traditional family form over others.

So, Mr Alex TTL, the logical extreme of your letter is: "The traditional family based system is acceptable because i think so. No need to prove. It just is. No need demographics, no need studies. I think therefore it is. So believe me. I am right. Devan is wrong. Gays are wrong. Because i said so."

CONGRATULATIONS. You have won the not-so-coveted Moron Award®. Let's through out demographics, studies, statistics, and LOGICAL THINKING altogether. Let's not question "acceptibility", let's just accept it as is BECAUSE you said so. BRILLIANT. It makes me want to be a moron too. How inspiring. CCB!

Labels: , , , , , ,


posted @4:38 PM
|

Profile

The Shane Man® - Leader of the Largest Nation in the World.
Photobucket
PROCRASTINATION

links

SASA!; Darren!; Sahoo!; Stephie!; ryanC!; KesterPoooon!; Pinky Karen!; Mrs Auyong!; Andy!; Gen!; Yan'an!; Lilian!; Shareen Purplegirl; Justin?; Brenda!; ANN-NETTE!; Ferdi boy!; dumbspeak?; Grace Gan!

tagboard

credits

designer ; dafont
Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

archives

  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • March 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • Shane Pereira's Facebook Profile